A selection of published works presented in esteemed journals and conferences.
Artificial intelligence-based pathology as a biomarker of sensitivity to
atezolizumab–bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective
study
Qinghe Zeng, Christophe Klein, Stefano Caruso, Pascale Maille, Daniela S Allende,
Beatriz Mínguez, Massimo Iavarone, Massih Ningarhari, Andrea Casadei-Gardini, Federica Pedica,
Margherita Rimini, Riccardo Perbellini, Camille Boulagnon-Rombi, Alexandra Heurgué, Marco Maggioni,
Mohamed Rela, Mukul Vij, Sylvain Baulande, Patricia Legoix, Sonia Lameiras, the HCC-AI study group*,
Léa Bruges, Viviane Gnemmi, Jean-Charles Nault, Claudia Campani, Hyungjin Rhee, Young Nyun Park,
Mercedes Iñarrairaegui, Guillermo Garcia-Porrero, Josepmaria Argemi, Bruno Sangro, Antonio
D’Alessio,
Bernhard Scheiner, David James Pinato, Matthias Pinter, Valérie Paradis, Aurélie Beaufrère, Simon
Peter, Lorenza Rimassa, Luca Di Tommaso, Arndt Vogel, Sophie Michalak, Jérôme Boursier, Nicolas
Loménie, Marianne Ziol, Julien Calderaro
Abstract: Background Clinical benefits of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
(atezolizumab–bevacizumab) are observed only in a subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
and the development of biomarkers is needed to improve therapeutic strategies.
Abstract: Background Clinical benefits of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
(atezolizumab–bevacizumab) are observed only in a subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
and the development of biomarkers is needed to improve therapeutic strategies. The
atezolizumab–bevacizumab response signature (ABRS), assessed by molecular biology profiling
techniques, has been shown to be associated with progression-free survival after treatment
initiation. The primary objective of our study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)
model
able to estimate ABRS expression directly from histological slides, and to evaluate if model
predictions were associated with progression- survival.
Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, we developed a model (ABRS-prediction; ABRS-P),
which was derived from the previously published clustering-constrained attention multiple instance
learning (or CLAM) pipeline. We trained the model fit for regression analysis using a multicentre
dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (patients treated by surgical resection, n=336). The ABRS-P
model was externally validated on two independent series of samples from patients with
hepatocellular carcinoma (a surgical resection series, n=225; and a biopsy series, n=157). The
predictive value of the model was further tested in a series of biopsy samples from a multicentre
cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab–bevacizumab (n=122).
All
samples in the study were from adults (aged ≥18 years). The validation sets were sampled between
Jan
1, 2008, to Jan 1, 2023. For the multicentre validation set, the primary objective was to assess
the
association of high versus low ABRS-P values, defined relative to cross-validation median split
thresholds in the first biopsy series, with progression-free survival after treatment initiation.
Finally, we performed spatial transcriptomics and matched prediction heatmaps with in situ
expression profiles.
Findings Of the 840 patients sampled, 641 (76%) were male and 199 (24%) were female. Across the
development and validation datasets, hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors included alcohol
intake,
hepatitis B and C virus infections, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Using cross-validation in
the
development series, the mean Pearson’s correlation between ABRS-P values and ABRS score (mean
expression of ABRS genes) was r=0·62 (SD 0·09; mean p<0·0001, SD<0·0001). The ABRS-P
generalised well on the external validation series (surgical resection series, r=0·60 [95% CI
0·51–0·68], p<0·0001; biopsy series, r=0·53 [0·40–0·63], p<0·0001). In the 122 patients
treated with atezolizumab–bevacizumab, those with ABRS-P-high tumours (n=74) showed significantly
longer median progression-free survival than those with ABRS-P-low tumours (n=48) after treatment
initiation (12 months [95% CI 7–not reached] vs 7 months [4–9]; p=0·014). Spatial transcriptomics
showed significantly higher ABRS score, along with upregulation of various other immune effectors,
in tumour areas with high ABRS-P values versus areas with low ABRS-P values.
Interpretation Our study indicates that AI applied on hepatocellular carcinoma digital slides is
able to serve as a biomarker for progression-free survival in patients treated with
atezolizumab–bevacizumab. This approach could be used in the development of inexpensive and fast
biomarkers for targeted therapies. The combination of AI heatmaps with spatial transcriptomics
provides insight on the molecular features associated with predictions. This methodology could be
applied to other cancers or diseases and improve understanding of the biological mechanisms that
drive responses to treatments.
Funding Institut National du Cancer, Fondation ARC, China Scholarship Council, Ligue Contre le
Cancer du Val de Marne, Fondation de l’Avenir, Ipsen, and Fondation Bristol Myers Squibb Pour la
Recherche en Immuno-Oncologie.
Regression-based Deep-Learning predicts molecular biomarkers from pathology
slides
Omar S. M. El Nahhas, Chiara M. L. Loeffler, Zunamys I. Carrero, Marko van
Treeck,
Fiona R. Kolbinger, Katherine J. Hewitt, Hannah S. Muti, Mara Graziani, Qinghe Zeng, Julien
Calderaro,
Nadina Ortiz-Brüchle, Tanwei Yuan, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Alexander Brobeil, Jorge S.
Reis-Filho, Jakob Nikolas Kather
Abstract: Deep Learning (DL) can predict biomarkers from cancer histopathology.
Several clinically approved applications use this technology. Most approaches, however, predict
categorical labels, whereas biomarkers are often continuous measurements.
Abstract: Deep Learning (DL) can predict biomarkers from cancer histopathology.
Several clinically approved applications use this technology. Most approaches, however, predict
categorical labels, whereas biomarkers are often continuous measurements. We hypothesized that
regression-based DL outperforms classification-based DL. Therefore, we developed and evaluated a
new
self-supervised attention-based weakly supervised regression method that predicts continuous
biomarkers directly from images in 11,671 patients across nine cancer types. We tested our method
for multiple clinically and biologically relevant biomarkers: homologous repair deficiency (HRD)
score, a clinically used pan-cancer biomarker, as well as markers of key biological processes in
the
tumor microenvironment. Using regression significantly enhances the accuracy of biomarker
prediction, while also improving the interpretability of the results over classification. In a
large
cohort of colorectal cancer patients, regression-based prediction scores provide a higher
prognostic
value than classification-based scores. Our open-source regression approach offers a promising
alternative for continuous biomarker analysis in computational pathology.
Selective internal radiation therapy for unresectable HCC: The SIRT
downstaging study
Hélène Regnault, Julia Chalaye, Athena Galetto-Pregliasco, Clara Perrin, Haytham
Derbel, Giuliana Amaddeo, Sébastien Mulé, Marie Lequoy, Hicham Kobeiter, Edouard Reizine, Emmanuel
Itti, Christophe Duvoux, Alexis Laurent, Vincent Leroy, Daniele Sommacale, Diana Rasolonirina, Alain
Luciani, Julien Calderaro, Vania Tacher, Raffaele Brustia
Abstract: Background Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is recommended
as
a downstaging (DS) strategy for solitary unresectable HCC <8 cm.
Abstract: Background Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is recommended
as
a downstaging (DS) strategy for solitary unresectable HCC <8 cm. The aim of this study was to
report the results of acquired experience in a tertiary center for all unresectable HCCs. Methods
We
conducted a retrospective, observational study using data collected from consecutive patients
undergoing SIRT between October 2013 and June 2020. DS was considered achieved when a curative
treatment could be proposed 6 months after SIRT. Results One hundred twenty-seven patients were
included (male = 90%, 64 ± 11 y), of whom 112 (n = 88%) had cirrhosis. HCC was classified as BCLC
stage C in 64 patients (50%), with a median diameter of 61 mm, an infiltrative pattern in 51
patients (40%), and portal vein invasion in 62 (49%) patients. Fifty patients (39%) achieved DS 6
months following SIRT, with 29 of them (23%) undergoing curative treatment in a median time of 4.3
months: 17 (13%) were transplanted, 11 (85%) had liver resection, and 1 patient had a
radiofrequency
ablation. The median overall survival of patients with or without DS was 51 versus 10 months,
respectively ( p < 0.001). In patients who achieved DS, progression-free survival was higher in
patients who underwent surgery: 47 versus 11 months ( p < 0.001). Four variables were
independently associated with DS: age (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: [0.92, 0.99]; p = 0.032), baseline
α-fetoprotein (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.00]; p = 0.034), HCC distribution (OR: 0.3, 95% CI:
[0.11,
0.75]; p = 0.012), and ALBI grade (OR: 0.34. 95% CI: [0.14, 0.80]; p = 0.014). Conclusions These
results suggest that SIRT in patients with unresectable HCC could be an effective treatment: DS
was
achieved for around 39% of the patients and more than half of these then underwent curative
treatment.
Should Hypervascular Incidentalomas Detected on Per-Interventional Cone
Beam
Computed Tomography during Intra-Arterial Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Impact the
Treatment Plan in Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation?
Abstract: Simple Summary Discovering hypervascular incidentalomas (HVIs) during
intra-arterial therapies (IATs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common condition,
Abstract: Simple Summary Discovering hypervascular incidentalomas (HVIs) during
intra-arterial therapies (IATs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common condition, but
guidelines lack precise management suggestions. This study examines whether to include HVIs in IAT
for HCC patients awaiting liver transplantation. A retrospective study analyzed liver-transplanted
HCC patients who received TACE or TARE before LT from 2014 to 2018. The study compared HCC
detection
rates between pre-interventional imaging and per-interventional CBCT and investigated correlations
between HVIs and poor prognosis criteria. Results showed higher nodule detection with CBCT and no
significant correlations between HVIs and poor prognosis criteria, tumor recurrence, or mortality.
Kaplan–Meier analysis found no significant impact of HVIs on recurrence-free, recurrence-related,
or
overall survival. These data may indicate that the treatment plan during IAT should not be
impacted
or modified in response to HVI detection in patients awaiting LT. Abstract Background: Current
guidelines do not indicate any comprehensive management of hepatic hypervascular incidentalomas
(HVIs) discovered in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients during intra-arterial therapies
(IATs).
This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of HVIs detected on per-interventional cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT) during IAT for HCC in patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT).
Material and methods: In this retrospective single-institutional study, all liver-transplanted HCC
patients between January 2014 and December 2018 who received transarterial chemoembolization
(TACE)
or radioembolization (TARE) before LT were included. The number of ≥10 mm HCCs diagnosed on
contrast-enhanced pre-interventional imaging (PII) was compared with that detected on
per-interventional CBCT with a nonparametric Wilcoxon test. The correlation between the presence
of
an HVI and histopathological criteria associated with poor prognosis (HPP) on liver explants was
investigated using the chi-square test. Tumor recurrence (TR) and TR-related mortality were
investigated using the chi-square test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), TR-related survival
(TRRS),
and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the presence of HVI using Kaplan–Meier
analysis. Results: Among 63 included patients (average age: 59 ± 7 years, H/F = 50/13), 36
presented
HVIs on per-interventional CBCT. The overall nodule detection rate of per-interventional CBCT was
superior to that of PII (median at 3 [Q1:2, Q3:5] vs. 2 [Q1:1, Q3:3], respectively, p < 0.001).
No significant correlation was shown between the presence of HVI and HPP (p = 0.34), TR (p =
0.095),
and TR-related mortality (0.22). Kaplan–Meier analysis did not show a significant impact of the
presence of HVI on RFS (p = 0.07), TRRS (0.48), or OS (p = 0.14). Conclusions: These results may
indicate that the treatment plan during IAT should not be impacted or modified in response to HVI
detection.